NEGA
- YOUR "Day to Day" INFORMATION EXCHANGE
Much
is gained at educational meetings that focus on topics
of concern for the moment and project ahead to resolve
emerging problems.
NEGA provides the option for more viable "day to day
exchange"and for action at a moments notice through
membership communications with one another.
Periodically a listing of members will be circulated
to all members. This communications process may develop
greater commonality in membership interests.
Apathy
and inaction by the membership may bring any organization
into decline. This is a time for a special rebirth
as the Association rapidly approaches the 50th year
of its founding!
ABOUT
"GERONTOLOGY TOPICS" - OUR NEWSLETTER
A quarterly NEGA Newsletter and periodic special supplements
are mailed to dues paying members to update them on
key information and events in New England and nationally
that have a bearing on their service objectives, and
other concerns
The
publication Gerontology Topics is planned
to provide articles and features on current topics
in a broad variety of aging concerns, to both individual
professional and institutional members.
Recent
issues have covered topics such as:"The Bottom
Line for long Term Care," "NEGA Guidance
for New NHA Licensees," "When to Get 'Ready
for Retirement?" Don't miss an issue! Join
today.
Assistance
shall he provided to members interested in developing
articles of interest reflecting research findings
or other areas for publication in the field of long-term
care.
HOT
TOPICS: MEMBERS' PROBLEMS & PRIORITIES
Everyone
providing services to the aging is concerned with
the question of quality care.
At
the same time a continuing shortage of resources in
even the best of facilities presents an almost insurmountable
dilemma. We would like to learn the ways and means
by which our members have coped with some of the chronic
problems which are always with us, in the quest for
providing better care within the reality of limited
resources.
Share
your ideas through GERONTOLOGY
TOPICS. If
you wish your identity may be kept confidential! We
welcome and use commentary from our members.
One
way of partially accommodating to the harsh competition
of nursing service "agencies" has been shared
for us through our membership as follows: It has been
achieved by greater flexibility by the individual
facility.
The
"Nursing Service Agency" generally provides contract
staff to facilities for one shift at a time and at
a very high premium over the allowances paid to most
employees. If a call in option were provided to staff
who did not wish to make a full time or regular commitment
a match could be reached between facility needs and
the convenience of the part time or periodic staff
member.
In
time such staff will know the facility and its patients
and function more efficiently than randomly assigned
Agency Staff Members. Cost to the facility would be
lowered and recruitment could be facilitated over
the long run.
With
cost control becoming more and more important it would
be well to see if staff members are aware of the intangibles
they receive, such as free coffee or reduced cost
meals. lnformation provided to your staff for their
personal fiscal well being at home such as budgeting
and no cost cafeteria benefit plans, may pay handsome
rewards in employee morale.
If
diversion of costs to staffing agencies might be shared
with your own staff through "in-house" staffing incentives
to cover special needs; both the staff and the facility
will benefit!
NEW ENGLAND NEWS
* Reprinted from Mass Aging:
The
Digest is published twice each month. Please share
this issue with your staff.
Nursing Homes
•
On Wednesday, December 21, the Department of Public Health (DPH) announced the results of its
first statewide nursing home satisfaction survey, which found high levels of satisfaction with nursing home care across the Commonwealth. More than
16,000 family members or other responsible parties of nursing home residents responded to the mailed survey, representing an impressive 64% response
rate. At a press conference to announce the results, Commissioner of DPH Paul Cote voiced his pleasure with the results and stated that, “I don’t
see these results as doing anything other than making people feel that the money that they are spending on nursing homes right now is money well
spent.” MassAging members scored particularly well on the survey results, averaging higher levels of satisfaction compared with the statewide
averages. Below is a summary of the evaluations comparing the average MassAging member nursing home with the statewide averages (scale ranges from 1
– 5 with 1 being very dissatisfied and 5 being very satisfied):
Category Statewide Average / MassAging Average
Overall Satisfaction 4.25 / 4.50
Resident Needs Being Met 4.10 / 4.37
Staff and Administration 4.18 / 4.36
Physical Environment 4.15 / 4.43
Activities 3.84 / 4.11
Personal Care 4.08 / 4.32
Food and Meals 3.94 / 4.20
Personal Rights 4.09 / 4.33
Additional information about the results including facility specific averages can be found on the DPH web site,
www.mass.gov/dph under What’s New and Nursing Home Satisfaction Program.
Nursing facilities were also mailed their own detailed results last week. The Department is also planning to post more detailed information about the
results, which will allow consumers (and providers) to compare results for specific facilities, sometime in 2006. Plans are also underway for
conducting another survey in 2006. If you have any questions, please contact Elissa Sherman at the MassAging office, (617.244.2999 or at esherman@MassAging.org.
Housing
•
HUD recently released a study completed in August of 2004 evaluating the Mark to Market
program. The study evaluates the overall implementation of the program, including both its cost savings to the federal government and its degree of
success in addressing the needs of the owners, the residents, and federal government. The evaluation provided detailed tables about the properties,
residents, and changes in rents as well as case studies from around the United States. One of the study's more interesting findings is the need for
exception rents in so many restructurings if the housing is to be preserved after the mark to market restructuring. To read the evaluation go to: www.huduser.org/publications/PUBASST/evalm2m.html
State Agencies and on Beacon Hill
•
The Commonwealth Corporation has announced the availability of new funding for the Extended
Care Career Ladder Initiative (ECCLI). This new round of funding will be for nursing facilities that have not received ECCLI funding in prior rounds.
Funding will be available up to $150,000 per project for CNA Career Ladder Training, English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) and a variety of
other training and workforce supports. In order to be eligible for this new round of funding, facilities that have not previously received ECCLI
funding will first need to submit a Notice of Intent to Comm Corp by January 20th.
Facilities that do not submit a Notice of Intent by January 20 will not be eligible to apply for funding. Beginning in early February, Comm Corp will hold a series of technical assistance sessions and full applications for funding
will be due on March 28th. The announcement from Comm Corp and the Notice of
Intent form that must be submitted to Comm Corp by January 20, 2006 has been posted to the MassAging web site www.MassAging.org under Members’ Only, Public Policy and
What’s New. For additional information about ECCLI, go to http://www.commcorp.org/programs/eccli/index.html
•
The Division of Health Care Finance and Policy (DHCFP) will hold a public hearing on Wednesday,
January 11th at 10:00 am to hear testimony on proposed amendments to regulations
governing maximum prices that temporary nursing agencies can charge health care facilities effective February 12, 2006. A copy of the hearing notice
and the proposed regulations can be found on the DHCFP web site, www.mass.gov/dhcfp under the link for Public Hearings.
Federal Agencies and On Capitol Hill
•
It looks like Congress will not be sending its budget reconciliation bill to the White House
before the New Year. Late last week, the U.S. Senate made technical changes to the budget bill, S. 1932, which requires another vote by the House in
order to get the bill to the White House. The House did meet late in the week, but the leadership decided that there would not be any recorded votes.
Since the Minority leadership insisted that a recorded vote be held on the budget, that vote will not be held until the House reconvenes next year.
The House now plans to defer any legislative activity until January 31, so it could be some time before the vote on the budget is held. A summary of
the budget reconciliation bill, developed by AAHSA staff is posted to the MassAging web site www.MassAging.org
under Members’ Only, Public Policy, What’s New. • The White House Conference on Aging (WHCoA) wrapped up two weeks ago with a major emphasis on technology. AAHSA's Center for
Aging Services Technologies' (CAST) Imagine Pavilion received national
and international recognition for showcasing current and future technologies that will help our nation meet the needs of an aging population.
Thousands of delegates, three Cabinet secretaries, and more than 50 media representatives attended the pavilion to learn how technology can transform
aging. AAHSA CEO, Larry Minnix gave a personal tour of the pavilion to Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt and Administration on Aging
head Josefina Carbonell; and, AAHSA had a visit from Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) and representatives of other congressional offices. There was
significant national media coverage. In closing, one of the final speakers said that, "technology will be the legacy of this WHCoA." In
addition, more than half of the 50 final resolutions adopted at the decennial White House Conference on Aging last week related to AAHSA's Five Big
Ideas and the elements of Quality First. For more information, go to www.aahsa.org.
Medicare Part D – Prescription Drug Benefit
•
It has been brought to the attention of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Prescription Drug Program officials that some nursing facilities have distributed letters to patients falsely asserting that CMS has placed a
requirement on facilities to contract only with long-term care (LTC) pharmacies that currently meet all of the Performance and Service Criteria for
LTC Network Providers under Medicare Part D. This is causing some LTC facilities to exclude some pharmacies from servicing Part D residents in their
LTC facilities. CMS has stated that this is an inappropriate reading of the CMS requirements and refers providers to the "Long-Term Care (LTC)
Convenient Access Standard Statement" which states: "…. any pharmacy - whether it is a LTC or retail
pharmacy - that can meet the ten performance and service criteria outlined in our March 2005 LTC Guidance and is willing to accept any other standard
contracting terms and conditions established by the plan for its network pharmacies can participate as an LTC network pharmacy. As clarified in
previous guidance, this means that network LTC pharmacies must have the capability to meet the performance and service criteria, either directly or
through a subcontractor. It does not mean that prospective LTC network pharmacies must show that they currently provide such services or that they
could provide all these service directly. The actual services that must be provided by the LTC network pharmacy will depend on the specific needs of
the specific LTC facilities serviced by the pharmacy."